When you’ve acted in a film franchise for many years, it’s natural that one would get very close to their castmates.
It’s a bonding experience that very few people can relate to and, often, the people you share it with become your closest friends.
That was true for the cast of the Harry Potter series who essentially grew up together on the set, due to starting work on 2001’s Sorcerer’s Stone as tweens.
They even almost got tattoos to commemorate their experience.
However, Daniel Radcliffe couldn’t commit to getting inked alongside Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, and he had a good (and funny) reason why.
What Was Being Planned For The Group Tattoos?
It’s not out of the ordinary for stars to get tattoos to commemorate a movie experience, especially those who are part of a long-running franchise. The main cast of the Avengers all got matching tatts after Avengers: Endgame, except for Mark Ruffalo, who remains a holdout. The Lord of the Rings cast also got inked to mark the three films that they did together. The cast of Suicide Squad even received tattoos, despite only doing the one movie. It’s understandable that after spending 10 years working on Harry Potter, that its triumvirate of co-leads would want to do the same. In an interview with The Mirror, Rupert Grint (who played Ron Weasley) said at the time:
There was talk between us about doing something like a tattoo. It would have been something subtle like Harry’s lightning scar. It would’ve been a great way of marking the end of filming.
A lightning bolt would’ve been perfect. It would be small and easily concealable, while also being a great tribute to the series. A little Deathly Hallows symbol also would’ve been a good pick, as it so specifically relates to the lore of the franchise. Designing something new and unique like the Avengers did could’ve also been neat. However, those tattoo dreams eventually died. While there may have been talk, they all never ended up going through with it. I suppose even a small tattoo was just too big of a commitment.
It’s not uncommon for actors who have worked together for many years on a film franchise to form close bonds with their castmates. This was especially true for the cast of the Harry Potter series, who essentially grew up together on set after starting work on 2001’s Sorcerer’s Stone as tweens. The idea of getting matching tattoos to commemorate their time together was floated around, with ideas ranging from subtle references like Harry’s lightning scar to unique designs similar to what the Avengers did after Avengers: Endgame.
However, when it came down to actually getting inked, Daniel Radcliffe couldn’t commit. In an interview with The Mirror, Rupert Grint mentioned that there was discussion among the cast about getting tattoos, but it never came to fruition. Despite the initial excitement and enthusiasm, it seems that the idea of permanently marking their time on Harry Potter was just too big of a commitment for the trio.
While the cast of the Avengers, Lord of the Rings, and even Suicide Squad have all taken the plunge and gotten matching tattoos to celebrate their time working together, it seems that the cast of Harry Potter ultimately decided against it. Perhaps the idea of a permanent reminder of their years on set was just too much to bear, or maybe they simply couldn’t agree on a design that felt right for all of them.
Regardless of the reason, it’s clear that the bond between the cast of Harry Potter goes far beyond the possibility of matching tattoos. Their shared experiences on set and the close friendships they formed will always be a lasting reminder of the magical time they spent together bringing J.K. Rowling’s beloved characters to life.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: CNN
