As many will recall, Meghan was married to Trevor for two years before they divorced in 2013, citing irreconcilable differences.
However, it seems their bitter split may continue causing drama behind the scenes.
Sources close to Meghan reveal she’s currently living in fear after Trevor made ominous threats to leak private information about her dating history before Prince Harry.
It’s said Meghan has been rushing to do damage control while simultaneously beefing up security at her Montecito mansion.
Though divorced for nearly a decade, insiders allege Trevor still harbors resentment towards Meghan for how she abruptly ended their marriage to pursue acting roles in Toronto,
leaving him heartbroken back in LA. Now, with her global fame and status as a role model scrutinized,
any revelations from her past threaten to undermine Meghan’s meticulously crafted public image of poise and virtue.
According to a friend of Trevor, in a fit of anger after learning details of Archie’s alleged false birth story, he allegedly contacted Meghan to taunt her about finally sharing the real Meghan if she didn’t pay him to stay silent. While unverified, such allegations suggest possible skeletons Meghan desperately wants to keep hidden.
Of course, with Trevor now remarried with children of his own, one must question his true motives. If the threats are real, could this simply be an opportunistic money grab at Meghan’s expense, or does he truly hold deep secrets still burning for revenge after her leaving so callously over a decade ago? While his representatives deny contacting Meghan at all, the very notion has left her terribly unsettled, say inside sources. She reportedly fears an exposé could destroy all she and Harry have worked to build so painstakingly in America.
So, what exactly could Trevor potentially leak? Let’s explore some possibilities, though emphasizing again these are only speculation. It’s certainly no secret Meghan had a busy social life as an actress, moving quickly between auditions and parties in Hollywood. Some acquaintances have alluded to multiple flings during this time, including rumors of a longer dalliance with a married director. If proven, this could undermine her image as a virtuous advocate speaking out against predatory behavior in entertainment.
More salacious still are unconfirmed whispers of an alleged one-night stand with a popular movie star while she and Trevor were still engaged. How would revelations of potentially cheating on her future husband with a suave A-lister play publicly given her regal persona now? Additionally murky is the timeline of exactly how serious she and Cory Vitiello truly were amid her final months with Trevor and whether any overlaps occurred there too. While emotionally detaching from her ex is normal for most, for a royal role model, such intimacies seen as immoral could destroy respect in more socially conservative circles.
One might argue Meghan’s private affairs pre-Harry are irrelevant now. However, if she is trying to establish herself as a global leader and influencer, even potential past hypocrisies threaten credibility when uncovered. Especially egregious false claims, as shown with Archie’s birth story, the fear appears to be any truths from Trevor could start an unraveling where more people share alternative slants on her persona versus realities.
Of course, Harry remains fully in Meghan’s corner, say those close to the couple. He has undoubtedly been reminded by her legal team of draconian UK libel laws, making it difficult to concretely prove speculative unauthorized biographies overseas without facing bankrupting lawsuits. Still, gossip rags locally may not hesitate to publish spicy claims from a bitter American ex, especially those contradictory to wholesome images. Social media would then spread such headlines internationally within hours, whether grounded or not.
To maximize chances of self-preservation, Meghan is wisely being more strategic in response to Trevor’s intimidation campaign. Despite understandable desires to lash out in defense, sources say cooler heads are counseling avoiding reactive provocations which only invite more damaging media cycles. A polite “no comment” leaves audiences to determine believability themselves rather than fueling the story. Likewise, an expensive settlement could incentivize copycats smelling paydays, while litigation validates a narrative by acknowledging aspects worth silencing.
Wiser it seems to maintain dignity by refusing to engage, let accusations dissipate on their own lacking substantiation, and remind the public nobody is perfect. Growth matters most.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: Los Angeles Times
